Now available:
The Road to Mythville
www.iuniverse.com and amazon.com
Click Here
A production of:
Mythville MetaMedia
mythville@yahoo.com
Although it may not be apparent, everything is in order.
Home
Archives:
BOCC seeks more time to deliberate
on Log Hill Mesa communications tower
Submitted for the approval or disapproval before the Ouray County Commissioners: the dead zones.
They are wild places so horrendously unqualified for all types of cutting edge communications devices that every branch of the region's law enforcement and emergency personnel appeared before the commissioners Monday, during a lively hearing on a controversial cell phone tower on Log Hill Mesa near Ridgway to bray, like coyotes, to the mutual chorus: Can you hear me now?
"When radios don't work it's hard for deputies to do their jobs," said Ouray County Sheriff Dominic Mattivi. "We've had calls where our deputies are out their and nobody can hear their cells."
Added Norm Rooker, chief of emergency services for Ouray County: "This is (about saving) lives. These are your lives. This system is costing you, the citizens, nothing."
By teaming up for a governmental/corporate partnership to pay for the 80-foot tower, to be built by Black & Veatch for the communications giant, Verizon, on land occupied by the Dallas Creek Water Company within Unit 1 of the Log Hill Village subdivision, a partnership has been created to build a $720,000 that the county could never, otherwise, afford.
"We have somebody willing to pony up at zero cost to the taxpayers," Rooker said.
On the other side of the more than two-hour debate Monday was the not-in-my-backyard crowd, mostly residents of the pricey community living on the mesa that is afforded breathtaking vistas of the San Juans, Mount Sneffles, and therefore, the rigid cascades serving as a backdrop for the Ralph Lauren Ranch.
Their broadcast before the commissioners: Most people are in favor of improving communications for the region, but why does it have to be in this neighborhood, especially one with such a picturesque setting?
"We are concerned about the current proposed tower's visual impacts," said Jane Nash of the Ridgway/Ouray Community Council. "We are in support of the tower, but not in a residential area."
Indeed, the specter of the possibility of an 80-foot communications tower on the mesa has now become a lightning rod for a baffling question over the wireless, highly microwaveable settlement of this high-profile corner of the New West.
While an attorney for the Log Hill Village Home & Property Owners' Association, Bob Thomas, argued that if it had been a simple development proposal before the commissioners, it ever would have been been considered for approval, the president of the HOA, Reggie Kajer, plead for the entire process to be slowed down so all viewpoints can be considered.
"The proposal for this 80-foot tower ... that we have to approve it now or everybody is going to die is wrong," he said. "I think we all should have been talking about this a year ago, and I think that's the problem."
It generated so much commentary during Monday's meeting in Ridgway, the commissioners didn't even have time to deliberate on what they heard. Instead, it moved to continue the decision on what had originally appeared to have been a slam dunk for a special meeting on Tuesday, Sept. 2, again in Ridgway at the 4-H Event Center.
Even before the list of 23 people who asked to speak began offering their comments, Commissioner Heidi Albritton could see the writing on the wall: that no approvals would be made during this week's meeting.
"I don't want to open up Pandora's box, but Pandora may be already out and about," she predicted before the public hearing portion of the meeting attended by approximately 60 people.
The delay was especially necessary considering the fact that, at the center of the debate, a mushy center had arisen in the form of a bit of a somewhat baffling administrative oversight. Included in the debate now is the question about what exactly the commissioners should base their ruling on regarding the nature of the “structure” versus “edifice” in terms of how it was to be interpreted in county's land use code.
At the end of the public hearing, Commissioner Keith Meinert told those in attendance that the semantics over the official "definition of structure" would be reviewed.
Prior to the meeting, the commissioners simply had to rubber stamp a recommendation for approval, by a 5-2 vote, of the Rigway Area Joint Planning Board. But now the commissioners find themselves looking at a complex question of values in which public safety and issues of visual impact would have to be weighed, and, quite possibly vivisected.
"I assure you, you have given us something to think about," Meinert said.
-- Douglas McDaniel, staff writer, Ridgway Sun